首页 > 数据库技术 > 详细

Oracle 11g IFS VS IFFS 性能对比

时间:2018-04-17 11:25:31      阅读:196      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]

一、说明

1、IFS (index full scan) 单块读,IFFS(index fast full scan)多块读。

2、在同时对表中某一列进行全扫描的时候看,多块读的速度明显要比单块读要快,性能要更好。

3、FTS(full table scan)和IFFS(index fast full scan)都为多块读。

4、IFFS(index fast full scan)为多块读,可并行,非排序

5、IFS(index full scan)为单块读、有序。

二、测试过程


SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.17

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.30

SQL> select /*+ index(tt idx_object_id) */ count(object_id) from tt;

 

COUNT(OBJECT_ID)

----------------

         5524288

 

Elapsed: 00:00:05.72

SQL> alter system flush buffer_cache;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.17

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

 

System altered.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

SQL> select count(object_id) from tt;

 

COUNT(OBJECT_ID)

----------------

         5524288

 

Elapsed: 00:00:01.35

SQL> explain plan for select /*+ index(tt idx_object_id) */ count(object_id) from tt;

 

Explained.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());

 

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3277332215

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation        | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |               |     1 |     5 | 12269   (1)| 00:02:28 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE  |               |     1 |     5 |         |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FULL SCAN| IDX_OBJECT_ID |  2762K|    13M| 12269   (1)| 00:02:28 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

9 rows selected.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.33

SQL> explain plan for select count(object_id) from tt;

 

Explained.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.01

SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());

 

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1131838604

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |             |     1 |     5 |  3335   (1)| 00:00:41 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |               |     1 |     5 |    |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_OBJECT_ID |  2762K|    13M|  3335   (1)| 00:00:41 |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

9 rows selected.

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.01

SQL> 


Oracle 11g IFS VS IFFS 性能对比

原文:http://blog.51cto.com/roidba/2104271

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
关于我们 - 联系我们 - 留言反馈 - 联系我们:wmxa8@hotmail.com
© 2014 bubuko.com 版权所有
打开技术之扣,分享程序人生!