public class TNonblockingServerSocket extends TNonblockingServerTransport {
private ServerSocketChannel serverSocketChannel = null;
}
protected TNonblockingSocket acceptImpl() throws TTransportException {
if (serverSocket_ == null) {
throw new TTransportException(TTransportException.NOT_OPEN, "No underlying server socket.");
}
try {
SocketChannel socketChannel = serverSocketChannel.accept();
if (socketChannel == null) {
return null;
}
TNonblockingSocket tsocket = new TNonblockingSocket(socketChannel);
tsocket.setTimeout(clientTimeout_);
return tsocket;
} catch (IOException iox) {
throw new TTransportException(iox);
}
}
public void registerSelector(Selector selector) {
try {
// Register the server socket channel, indicating an interest in
// accepting new connections
serverSocketChannel.register(selector, SelectionKey.OP_ACCEPT);
} catch (ClosedChannelException e) {
// this shouldn‘t happen, ideally...
// TODO: decide what to do with this.
}
}
public class TServerSocket extends TServerTransport {
private ServerSocket serverSocket_ = null;
}
protected TSocket acceptImpl() throws TTransportException {
if (serverSocket_ == null) {
throw new TTransportException(TTransportException.NOT_OPEN, "No underlying server socket.");
}
try {
Socket result = serverSocket_.accept();
TSocket result2 = new TSocket(result);
result2.setTimeout(clientTimeout_);
return result2;
} catch (IOException iox) {
throw new TTransportException(iox);
}
}
同一时候SelectorThread又维护了一个堵塞队列acceptedQueue,从acceptedQueue中拿新创建好的SocketChannel,来注冊读事件
同步的TServer有TThreadPoolServer,关联一个TServerSocket,採用同步IO的方式来Accept,然后交给一个线程池来处理兴许动作
这里有一篇老外写的文章比較各种server的性能。https://github.com/m1ch1/mapkeeper/wiki/Thrift-Java-Servers-Compared
结论是TThreadSelectorServer在吞吐量和server响应时间的表现都是最优的
Thrift源代码分析(七)-- TServerserver分析
原文:http://www.cnblogs.com/yangykaifa/p/7064218.html